By William Wolf

PROOF  Send This Review to a Friend

If one didn’t see Mary-Louise Parker in the play “Proof” on and off Broadway, one might be more disposed to enjoying the film version starring Gwyneth Paltrow in the role of Catherine, a young woman who is mourning the death of her mathematician father and may have solved a monumental mathematical problem in her own right. The issues at hand are whether Catherine indeed has scored such a coup, whether she can prove it, her fears of becoming mentally unstable as her father was after doing his great work and the determination of her dominating sister to pluck her out of her home and environment. At heart is also the issue of a male tendency not to readily believe that a woman could achieve such a monumental breakthrough in math that has eluded ambitious men.

Parker crackled in the role, showing Catherine to be witty and feisty and still portraying her vulnerable side, but always grounded in her dignity and determination not to be cowed by her overbearing sister, who is played very impressively on screen by Hope Davis. Films should stand on their own, but the memory of Parker comes to mind as a way of defining what is wrong with the film version of David Auburn’s play, even though he collaborated on the screenplay with Rebecca Miller.

Paltrow is so whiny and hysterical that it is harder to imagine her as a math whiz. Also there seems to be less wit and sharpness than I recall in the stage version. “Proof,” directed by John Madden, retains its intellectual bent, but seems toned down from the way it was performed by Parker, with Catherine having given off more intellectual vibes in a much deeper performance than Paltrow delivers.

Anthony Hopkins plays Catherine’s father Robert. Although he is intermittently present, we soon catch on that he has died. This sort of device is easier to pull off successfully on stage where audiences, seduced by the magic of theater, more readily suspend disbelief, as opposed to the realism of film. Still, Hopkins is very good in the part, especially when we pity him for his mental condition in the flashbacks, all the more so because he acts as if he is perfectly sane and on a roll of mathematical discovery. Jake Gyllenhaal is effective as Hal, Catherine’s friend who is skeptical about her discovery and jealous of the possibility that she could overshadow him.

Flaws aside “Proof” is interesting and provocative even if it lacks the overall strength it should have. How many plays do we find involving excitement in solving math problems? A Miramax Films release.

  

[Film] [Theater] [Cabaret] [About Town] [Wolf]
[Special Reports] [Travel] [HOME]