By William Wolf

THE BEST TEN FILMS OF 2017  Send This Review to a Friend

The films on this list have been selected from among those released in New York theaters during the year and are listed in order of preference.











Other outstanding films of 2017 listed in no special order include: Graduation; Darkest Hour; Faces Places; Molly’s Game; The Women’s Balcony; Lady Bird; Foxtrot; Menashe; A Fantastic Woman; Dunkirk; Beatriz at Dinner; Call Me By Your Name; Downsizing; Aftermath; Afterimage' Wonder Wheel; Wonderstruck; The Florida Project; Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri; Stronger; Maudie; Mudbound; Victoria & Abdul; First They Killed My Father; Harold and Lillian: A Hollywood Love Story; Detroit; The Big Sick; The Promise; In the Fade; Wind River; Jane; The Unknown Girl; BPM (Beats per Minute); The Midwife; The Fencer; Indivisible; Footnotes; My Journey Through French Cinema; The Ticket.


I wonder what Orson Welles would have thought of the completed version of his “The Other Side of the Wind,” which has been finally brought to light after years of rights battles and professional efforts to piece together of the footage left incomplete in Welles’s lifetime.

The New York Film Festival has provided a service by showing the film in its revivals section and Netflix deserves credit for bringing about its release. Now it is up to the public to judge and the results are bound by the very nature of the enterprise to be mixed. First, it is important to attempt to surmise what Welles was trying to do when he began shooting in 1970.

From the reconstruction it would seem that Welles was attempting to cast a satirical eye on the process of making movies, with particular attention on the odd gang of people involved in the making. His vision is a turbulent, dark and often comic take behind the chaotic scenes, including a sprawling party in honor of a director’s 70th birthday. One may think of Fellini’s “8½,” also about a director trying to make a movie.

Story-wise the result is an odd conglomeration, as per the screenplay credited to Oja Kodar and Welles. Kodar, born in Croatia, was Welles’s significant other in the latter years of his life. Their collaboration added a further personal dimension.

On the plus side there is fabulous imagery throughout. John Huston, cast as the director, Jake Hannaford, has a face that is totally impressive and it is repeatedly shown in commanding close-ups. His imperial manner is also there, and one of the film’s pleasures is watching him in this central role.

There are also scenes with the beautiful Kodar playing the leading actress, including many nude shots of her, and they are extremely arresting as seen from various camera perspectives doting on her.

The cast also includes Peter Bogdanovich as a disciple of the director, a role played in real life. It is interesting to see the shots of him in his youthful days. His extensive appearances are especially appropriate, as he has been an expert on Welles and a force in pursuit of getting the film freed and completed.

There are impressive appearances of Lilli Palmer, Susan Strasberg, Mercedes McCambridge, Paul Stewart and Robert Random. In fact, one can enjoy the nostalgia of seeing such notables as Edmund O’Brian and Cameron Mitchell. Claude Chabrol, Stephane Audran, Henry Jaglom and Paul Mazursky are also on hand.

Other pleasures are to be found in the set pieces, including a sequence in a drive-in theater. As you might expect, Welles amassed many shots in keeping with his reputation for trying to be unique, and the film is a visual treasure trove.

However—and this is a big however--the bottom line is that if a viewer cannot enjoy all of the above attributes from the point of view of a cinema junkie, one can become completely lost and exasperated in trying to follow what’s going on in the story.

Welles would have undoubtedly edited his film into more solid shape story-wise before he was finished. What we get now is a mélange of his footage. But it must be said with satisfaction that at last the fabled Orson Welles movie is out of the closet, and the mystery can be relegated to film history, the film now to be viewed as part of the great director’s body of work. A Netflix release. Reviewed October 21, 2018.

NEW YORK FILM FESTIVAL 2018--WILDLIFE  Send This Review to a Friend

Growing up is difficult for Joe (excellent Ed Oxenbould) in “Wildlife,” shown in the 2018 New York Film Festival and now in release. He must deal with the disarray in the lives of his parents in the film directed by Paul Dano, who co-wrote the screenplay with Zoe Kazan based on Richard Ford’s 1990 novel.

Set in the 1960s in Montana, the story focuses on Jake Gyllenhaal as Jerry Brinson, a man who can’t find a satisfactory place in life. He works on a golf course, but gets fired for being too cozy with members with whom he likes to chat, and when he is offered the opportunity to return, his sense of dignity leads him to refuse no matter how badly he needs money for keeping up with expenses.

Carey Mulligan plays his wife, Jeanette, who stoically tries to cope as best as she can with the difficult circumstances. But her patience runs out when Jerry suddenly get a bug that he can fulfill himself and gain self-satisfaction by enlisting to fight forest fires raging in the state. Jeanette is appalled that he would go off to risk his life when he has a family.

Jeanette gets a job as a swimming instructor, and soon she is being pursued by one of the enrollees, Warren (Bill Camp), who has a successful automobile business. Warren, although older and not especially attractive, is Mr. Nice Guy, and an affair blossoms while Jerry is off battling blazes.

I’m not sure I buy the personality transformation Jeanette undergoes, although the affair itself has its logic. She also doesn’t hide her liaison from Joe, and it is from his viewpoint that the film achieves its greatest poignancy. Joe must learn to fend for himself emotionally no matter what the situation with his parents becomes. Oxenbould does a fine job in portraying Joe, which is a highlight of the film.

One gets caught up in wondering how it will all turn out, which is a tribute to this first directorial job by Dano and to the screenplay. Sympathy is engendered for the parents, as well as for Joe, thanks to the solid acting by Gyllenhaal and Mulligan, and “Wildlife” emerges as a solid drama. An IFC Films release. Reviewed October 19, 2018.

NEW YORK FILM FESTIVAL 2018--PRIVATE LIFE  Send This Review to a Friend

The obsession of a couple wanting to have a baby is examined with a mix of pain and humor in “Private Life,” a main slate feature in the 56th New York Film Festival and now in commercial release. Written with wit and directed by Tamara Jenkins, the film is highlighted by superb cast members who skillfully capture the angst involved and the effect on a marriage and related relationships.

Why is it so important and defining to have a child? Rachel, a writer with a novel about to be published, is played by Kathryn Hahn, who communicates the desperation of a wife whose life begins to be defined by her total obsession with giving birth. Her husband, Richard, is played by Paul Giamatti, a businessman, who goes along with Rachel’s longings until the situation becomes stifling, resulting in an absence of sex between them. We see them living in a lower East Side Manhattan apartment, and Hahn and Giamatti make the couple painfully believable, including in situations colored with humor. Picture Richard, for example, in an isolated room and haplessly watching porn, which is supposed to stimulate his delivery of sperm for the couple’s attempt at in vitro fertilization.

They try everything. Richard’s can ejaculate but there is no effective sperm. Rachel turns out not to be fertile. They try the adoption route by answering surrogate ads, and that leads to a road trip and disappointment.

Richard has a niece by marriage, the 25-yeqr-old Sadie, who is at sea academically and trying to find her place in life. She is impressively played most sympathetically by the excellent Kayli Carter. The film takes a desperate new turn via the close relationship Richard and Rachel have with Sadie, who looks up to them and becomes sympathetic to their goal. As one might expect, that leads to complications with Sadie’s mother.

As I watched the toll on Rachel’s and Richard’s marriage, as fine as the acting is, I began to become impatient with this child-bearing obsession. In light of such an all-consuming desire, one might wonder that if Rachel and Richard ever managed to acquire a kid whether they would make good parents. One could envision their parental lives fraught with fresh anxieties.

The film is successful in the convincing manner that writer-director Jenkins focuses on the issue and prompts thoughts about what other couples may also be going through. Despite society’s current efforts to view women as emerging from the confines of traditional domesticity, “Private Life” suggests that in some, motherhood still defines a woman’s being and those who cannot achieve it may feel deprived and left out. In that sense this film is an engrossing and sometimes wry look at one couple’s symbolic struggle. A Netflix release. Reviewed October 5, 2018.


It was a gala opening night for the 56th New York Film Festival, a major annual cultural event of New York City, and the Festival (Sept. 28-October 14, 2018) got under way with the unusual film “The Favourite,” directed by Yorgos Lanthimos, with screenings at Alice Tully Hall and the Walter Reade Theater. Then it was off to a huge bash at the Tavern on the Green that started at 11 p.m.

Lanthimos was on hand for the occasion. Introduced at the screening that I attended by Dennis Lim, the Festival’s director of programming, Lanthimos, told the audience: “It’s a great thrill for our film to be shown as the opening night film.” The director is especially known for his “The Lobster.”

The after-party, as was the case at last year’s Festival, continued traditionally at the landmark Tavern on the Green in Central Park following a hiatus during the restaurant’s renovation. While it was closed the Festival parties were held at the Harvard Club. Given the pleasant weather, much of the socializing at this year’s party was in the Tavern’s large outdoor space, although indoor rooms were also packed. There were generous servings of hors d’oeuvres by waiters, and main dishes were at conveniently located buffets. Drinks offered were wine, bubbly and an assortment of coctails made with rum.

This year’s Festival has a slate of 30 new films from 22 various countries by a mix of directors. Chosen for the centerpiece was “Roma,” directed by Alfonso Cuarón, with the closing night selection “At Eternity’s Gate,” directed by Julian Schnabel. The Festival also includes many additional films under the categories “Spotlight on Documentaries,” “Revivals,” “Special Events,” “Retrospectives,” “Shorts” and “Projections,” the latter exploring new possibilities for cinema. A large corps of press and industry members were accredited for special screenings.

As for the opening night “The Favourite,” it is a film that further demonstrates director Lanthimos’s broad imagination. Here, with a screenplay by Deborah Davis and Tony McNamara, he explores freely perceived bedroom escapades during the 18th century reign of Queen Anne between her and Sarah Churchill, the Duchess of Marlborough, and also between the queen and servant Abigail Hill.

Queen Anne ruled England, Scotland and Ireland from 1702 to 1707, and then, after Scotland and England were merged into Great Britain, she ruled from 1707-1714, when she died at the age of 49. Queen Anne suffered from gout and other illnesses, and she had a disastrous record of childbirths. There were some 17 pregnancies, including miscarriages and babies dying at birth or shortly afterward. Of five successful births, four children died before the age of two.

The queen is played by Olivia Colman and she is shown as clumsy, overweight and frequently wracked with pain, with a badly swollen leg, and having great difficulty walking. The duchess, given a stark performance by Rachel Weisz, cares for her, and we see them having sex.

Emma Stone sassily portrays Abigail and, young and beautiful, Abigail gains the affection of the queen, much to the consternation of the duchess, and nasty, scheming competition erupts. The situation is complicated by the queen’s frequent tantrums. One minute she can be friendly, the next angry and cruel.

Much of what happens is funny from the perspective of the screenwriters and director. The film comes across as a satire on royalty, and certainly on hidden bedroom cravings, which play out as bizarre rather than erotic.

All this is wrapped in the trappings of palace luxury and lifestyle, and the colorful palace grounds and environs, strikingly photographed by cinematographer Robbie Ryan. Political aspects are introduced, but the main concentration is on the three women and what occurs between them, sexually and otherwise.

“The Favourite” is such an oddball film that it is assured divided reactions, but those who find Lanthimos’s work appealing are likely to be pleased and amused by his foray into 18th century royalty and his imagining what happens behind the scenes. The film is a Fox Searchlight release scheduled for November 23. The Festival scored a coup for getting it as the 56th Festival’s opening night choice. Posted October 4, 2018.


Prepare yourself for an outstanding experience if you go to the magnificent Met exhibition of works by French painter Eugène Delacroix (1798-1863). The show, scheduled from September 17, 2018 to January 6, 2019, ranks among the renowned museum’s most illustrious events. It is the first Delacroix retrospective in North America and was organized with the Musée du Louvre in Paris. Nearly 150 of the artist’s works, including prints and drawings in addition to his stunning paintings, are on display.

It is intriguing to see the extent to which Delacroix was inspired by literature, such as writing by Shakespeare, Lord Byron and Walter Scott. Delacroix’s art, organized and displayed to reflect different periods of his life, ranges from his most intimate works to his huge, impressive achievements. (Some of his murals are too large to have been shipped here for this display.) The museum reports that research involved in selecting his work included surveying more than 800 paintings, eight thousand drawings, one hundred prints and many written pages.

You will find your own favorites as you amble through the exhibit. One especially striking work is his “Greece on the Ruins of Missolonghi.” There is also a very expressive expression on the face of the subject in another work, “Head of an Old Greek Woman.” His renderings of Christ on the cross are extremely poignant. One can also be deeply moved by his stark “Medea About to Kill Her Children.”

Delacroix ventured into action paintings, vivid scenes of battle, in which he showed the effect on horses as well as combatants. He was especially adept at giving a feeling of live action in some of his military works.

We can also see many paintings devoted to animals, as with his arresting painting of a tiger, as well as a number of others addressing the animal world. One, “The Lion Hunt” conveys a mass of turbulent struggle.

Delacroix spent a period in Morocco and Algeria, and a particularly fascinating painting is “Women of Algiers in Their Apartment.” On studying the painting one can be struck by the meticulousness he achieves in the delicacy with which he paints an array of materials, in addition to his expertise in conveying the expressions on the faces of his three women subjects.

One can also discover nude studies, including a rear view of a “Male Academy Figure,” “A Female Academy Figure Seated, Front View” and “Reclining Female Nude, Back View.”

The exhibit also includes self-portraits and Delacroix appears quite handsome in these takes on how he saw himself.

Should you go, I suggest you allow plenty of time, as there is so very much to take in. If you rush you will miss a lot-- this is an exhibit that especially requires you to pace yourself. Ideally it would be best to plan more than one visit.

Among the comments shown by other artists about Delacroix’s paintings is a famous one offered by Picasso, who said with apparent envy, “That Bastard. He’s really good.” This showing is not likely to make one disagree. At the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1000 Fifth Avenue. Phone: 212-535-7710. Posted September 16, 2018.


Dancer, choreographer and artistic director Fadi J. Khoury’s dance company, known as FJK, launched its fifth annual season with performances September 13 and 14, 2018, at the Gerald W. Lynch Theater at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

Born in Iraq, Khoury is versed in Arab culture and folklore, to which his dance concepts are especially related, as well as also embracing jazz and classical. Performers are adept at body movement as a vibrant part of their dancing abilities. Khoury takes a lead role in most of the works presented.

I attended the September 13th performance and found the opener the most riveting. “Echoes,” a dance inspired by Dabke, folkloric traditional Bedouin dance from the mountains of Lebanon and Syria, featured Middle Eastern drums and percussion with electric based sounds and rhythms.

Five men and five women, sensually costumed, danced with great intensity and waving movements as an entire unit and breaking up into groups. The striking looking men were bare-chested, projecting gym-worthy physiques. Choreographer Khoury created perfectly synchronized body language for both sexes and the number frequently attained frenzied excitement. Soloists were especially appealing, and the entire experience was visually expressive and captured the essence of the company’s folk leanings.

Perhaps just to show versatility, the second number was titled “Waltz,” and that is exactly what it was, couples stylishly waltzing in what was a far cry from the first selection and more like old-fashioned ballroom dancing. The guest choreographer was Gary Pierce. Another first act offering was “Clockwork,” with Debbie Roshe as guest choreographer.

After the intermission, the dancers returned with a premiere of what was obviously meant as a major accomplishment titled “UnTold.” Also rooted in Middle East culture, this was a lavish intertwining of bodies and assorted movement creating a non-stop panorama to music by Hossam Ramzy and Phil Thornton. It went on at length, and although so much effort was poured into the concept and the dancers achieved their customary excellence, from my viewpoint, it was outshone by the especially admirable creativity demonstrated in the evening’s consistently striking first number, “Echoes.”

Particularly important in the company is accomplished Sevin Ceviker, associate artist and principal dancer. She was born inTurkey and trained there at an early age. It is also noteworthy that Khoury designs the costumes for the troupe.

The company’s dancers of varied origins include, Elisa Torn Franky (Bogota, Columbia); Serena Giannini (Bellinzona, Switzerland); Lucia Jackson (Madrid, Spain, and New York City); Stefanie Roper (Ft. Lauderdale Florida); Gabriela M Soto (Puerto Rico); Estafano Gil (Caracas, Venezuela); Gianni Goffredo (Italy); Dannys Gonzalez (Cuba), and Jose Losada (Cuba). At the Gerald W. Lynch Theater, 524 West 59th Street. Posted September 15, 2018.

LIVES WELL LIVED--UPDATE  Send This Review to a Friend

Sky Bergman’s excellent film “Lives well Lived,” about oldsters making the most of their later years, and having already been playing in many cities around the United States, has finally landed a New York venue. (See Search, Special Reports for original article containing review.)

The documentary will be screened July 19-24 at the Carole Zabar Center for Film at the Marlene Meyerson JCC (Jewish Community Center) at 334 Amsterdam Avenue (at 75th Street) in New York City. For further information phone: 646-505-4444.

Sky Bergman, noted photographer as well as the director of the film, will take part in Q and A sessions following the July 19 and 20 screenings. Posted June 25, 2018.


One of the talked about films in the moviemaking of the late renowned artist Andy Warhol was his “The Chelsea Girls.” Now a beautiful new coffee-table-sized book explores in depth that controversial film, both admired and disliked when it was released in 1966. The volume is dramatically enhanced with striking photographs. Very impressive, “Andy Warhol’s Chelsea Girls” is a joint publication by D.A.P./Distributed Art Publishers, Inc. and the Andy Warhol Museum.

There is the script for the film, which remains an avant-garde look at life in the noted Chelsea Hotel on West 23rd Street in Manhattan, including the cast of characters who were part of the free-wheeling lifestyle among renowned literary figures and others of that era.

There are profiles of those involved with the film, Warhol included, an overview of the film and samplings of the pro and con reviews of the time, reviews that ranged from criticizing the film as impossibly boring to praise for advancing the art of cinema.

The stunning photographs are generously positioned throughout the book, and the tome affords a new generation the opportunity to become familiar with those who became part of the Warhol’s retinue. Thoughtful essays help place “The Chelsea Girls” in the artistic context of the period.

(Personal disclosure: My review from Cue Magazine’s December 17, 1966 issue is included--it was on the negative side--and I am thanked for my cooperation in the acknowledgments.)

I was not prepared for how impressive the book is when I received my copy. It is quite an achievement to take one film, a disputed one at that, and come up with such an all-embrasive and visually arresting work.

The Warhol Museum is a story in itself. After great, extended efforts by various individuals and institutions, it finally opened in 1994, logically located in Pittsburgh, PA., where Warhol was born. It preserves Warhol’s art and keeps his memory alive. Warhol died unexpectedly at the age of 58 in 1987.

Warhol’s art work remains better known and monetarily valuable. But although Warhol’s films have been secondary, they constitute important evidence of how he saw the world. “The Chelsea Girls” in particular reflects the essence of what Warhol brought to the screen in style and content—lengthy looks at subjects he chose with efforts to be different, such as using split screen technique and challenging viewers to go along with unusually slow pacing in quest of fly-on-the-wall intimacy. There is validity in the choice of this film to illustrate what Warhol was exploring.

“Andy Warhol’s The Chelsea Girls” arrives as an important addition to film history. Posted June 5, 2018.


A roster of stars had lots of complimentary things to say about Dame Helen Mirren at the Film Society of Lincoln Center Gala, at which she received the 45th annual Chaplin Award. But the greatest evidence of her achievements was the screened collection of clips that revealed her extraordinary performance range and the outstanding career that brought her to the honor.

The audience at Alice Tully Hall on April 30 only had to look at a scene from “Hitchcock” (2012) in which, as Hitchcock’s wife Alma, she passionately explodes with her list of grievances about what she has endured from him, or, for another example, to see her in her starring role from “The Queen” (2006).

In one clip after another the range of parts she has played and her ability to inhabit whatever role with insight and perfection were amply illustrated. Mirren watched evidence of her career flashing before her from a seat in the orchestra after her un-announced entrance just before the program started was spotted and touched off a burst of applause.

The award was presented to her by Jeremy Irons, one of her distinguished co-stars in her film career that began in 1967. Irons warmly spoke of her skill, and in a personal note, said that when working with her “it is hard not to fall a little in love with her.”

One of the gala’s speakers—among them were Mikhail Baryshnikov, Vin Diesel and Julie Taymor--was director Taylor Hackford, Mirren’s husband of some 30 years, who talked about their life together and her admirable qualities, describing their marriage as “one long passion.” Looking toward Mirren seated in the audience, he added, “I love you.”

Julie Taymor spoke of how she had worked with Mirren in filming her version of “The Tempest” (2010), in which Mirren played the role of Prospero, here changed to Prospera to go with the flow of the unusual casting. There was a clip shown of Mirren standing on a hill in a huge, oversized coat, and Taymor told of how hot it was during that part of the filming and how Mirren dutifully endured wearing that heavy garment.

These days no major event in New York is likely to come off without some political comments. There was a film clip of Billy Crystal saluting Mirren. He got a laugh when he apologized for not being present because “my lawyer, Michael Cohen, told me to lay low.”

Robert De Niro was present and he provided the most political comments of the night. He stressed the meaning of the award named after Charlie Chaplin, who was an immigrant, an important point given the current attacks on immigration. But he first wisecracked to Mirren: “Congratulations for being honored with this year’s Chaplin Award. This is what happens when you have weak immigration laws.”

De Niro launched into an attack on bullying, specifically against limiting free speech. He sharply rebuked the White House Correspondents’ Association for caving in to criticism of Michelle Wolf’s acerbic comedy routine and apologizing. “Shame on them,” De Niro asserted.

I have attended almost every Film Society awards gala, starting with the first one in 1972 honoring Charlie Chaplin when he returned to America after his 20-year-exile, having been barred barred from the U.S. in 1952 during the McCarthy era. (I had visited him at his home in Vevey, Switzerland, earlier in 1972 when he granted me an interview.) In that year he was also given an honorary Oscar.

Many distinguished film people have been celebrated by the Film Society of Lincoln Center in the years since the Chaplin gala, and it was a pleasure to this time see Mirren, looking beautiful in her colorful designer dress, mount the platform, receive her award from Irons, and proceed to elaborately thank the audience and the Film Society for the meaningful honor. It is richly deserved. Posted May 2, 2018.


[Film] [Theater] [Cabaret] [About Town] [Wolf]
[Special Reports] [Travel] [HOME]